YouTube mobile app logo phone

On the YouTube social media ban

Recently the Commonwealth Government announced that YouTube will be included in the proposed social media ban for people aged under 16. To be clear, this only applies to accounts. You will still be able to watch videos without being logged in. Although this does restrict the ability to view some videos that require you to log in.

I am writing this from the point of view of a video creator. I started my channel over seven years ago and since then I’ve produced over 130 videos viewed over 4.2 million times. Even though I’m not under 16, I believe that this will impact my channel and many others like it.

I think that these new restrictions will likely see an overall drop in views and subscribers. Exactly how many? I don’t know and it remains to be seen. But I am acutely aware that channels like mine with a mostly-Australian audience will likely be more affected than those with more global coverage and topics.

The reason is that I don’t think this will just affect people who are under the age of 16. The requirement to prove your age through uploading your ID or other mechanisms will likely put people off maintaining their existing account or creating a new one. Recent data leaks from major companies don’t inspire confidence that anything uploaded to prove your age won’t just be leaked on the Dark Web in a couple of months. Or even if it isn’t, that these companies won’t sell or otherwise use this valuable data in other ways. Even if these were somehow magically resolved, this doesn’t address fundamental issue of anonymity online.

I have no plans to move away from YouTube at this point. For all its faults, YouTube is still the place to be for creating and sharing videos online. It has a far greater reach and audience than any comparable website and has the most extensive brand recognition. But I will be keeping a close eye on what happens and the impact on how people access and interact with content.

Comments

5 responses to “On the YouTube social media ban”

  1. I don’t like companies having more of our identity data either.
    I’ve already had to get a new license since Optus couldn’t keep their systems secure.

    1. There should be no need for organisations to store identity documents, and changing processes and legislation around this should be simple.

      Given that the identity credentials are being referenced against government databases, all that should be stored at the organisation level is a confirmation/transaction code for the identification. Just like credit card authorisation codes of yesteryear.

  2. I don’t think your concerns are warranted. Your account won’t be marked as restricted, and will be open to all, regardless of age. I can’t see why anyone will need to be logged in to view your channel. YouTube for Kids will still be available. Most long time members of YouTube will have already proved their age in one way or the other. As far as I know, the details of proving your age aren’t known.

    I am thinking of some film clips that can be seen on YouTube, and I don’t think they are at all appropriate for children, yet, they are only clips from adult rated films, so why should they not be available to adults, and not available to children.

    1. But if you’re not logged in, you can’t subscribe…

    2. Philip Mallis Avatar
      Philip Mallis

      Hi Andrew, I’m not so much concerned about overall access to my videos. You’re right that you’ll still be able to see them without having an account or logging in but my main concern is about subscribers, comments and other interactions with the channel. People can’t do any of those things without being logged into an account.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.